Pages

Saturday, February 16, 2013

WAS THE CONCEPT OF RELATIVITY KNOWN LONG BEFORE EINSTEIN AND DID KEPLER ONLY RESTATED WHAT WAS KNOWN TO MAHARISHI BHRIGU





IF WE LOOK AT THE DAILY EPHEMERIS OR PANCHANG IT SHOWS THAT THE PLANET DO NOT MOVE AT THE CONSTANT VELOCITY IN ORBITING THE SUN THEY ARE MARGI AND VAKRI I.E AT TIMES THERE SPEED IS VARIABLE THEY ACCELERATE AND DECELERATE SOME TIMES COVERING  SEVERAL DEGREES(TOTAL 360) PATH  IN A DAY .SOME PLANETS MOVE UPTO 2 DEGREE IN A DAY AT TIMES AND AT OTHER TIMES ONLY A FEW MINUTES(FRACTION OF DEGREE) . IT CLEARLY SHOWS THAT MAHARISHI BHRIGU NOT ONLY KNEW THAT PLANETS MOVE WITH VARIABLE VELOCITY ORBITING AROUND THE SUN BUT HAVE ALSO CHARTED DOWN THE EXTENT OF VARIABILITY OF MOTION AROUND SUN IN FORM OF PANCHANGS   AS CONFIRMED BY KEPLER LATER THAT PLANETS DON'T MOVE WITH UNIFORM VELOCITY AROUND  SUN DUE TO THEIR ELLIPTICAL ORBIT PATH AROUND THE SUN AND ALSO THEY MOVE WITH VARIABLE VELOCITY.

NOW TO UNDERSTAND THE EXTENT OF CONCEPT OF RELATIVITY INHERENT IN  ASTROLOGY LET US DEFINE A  VAKRI PLANET . IT IS A PLANET MOVING SO SLOWLY RELATIVE TO THE EARTH THAT IS ACTUALLY SEEMS TO RECEDE IT NOT THAT PLANET STARTS TO MOVE BACKWARD BUT DUE TO RELATIVE MOTION WITH RESPECT TO EARTH THEY APPEAR TO MOVE BACKWARD THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT CONCEPT OF RELATIVITY STATE IN THE SIMPLEST TERM .SO DID MAHARISHI BHRIGU KNEW THE RELATIVITY CONCEPT LONG BEFORE EINSTEIN .SIMILARLY A MARGI GRAH IS PLANET WITH POSITIVE RELATIVE MOTION OR MOVING FORWARD WITH RESPECT TO EARTH

GIVEN THE FACT THAT MAHARISHI BHRIGU DIDN'T HAD ANY TELESCOPE TO PREDICT OR LOOK AT THE MOTION OF STARS HOW IS SUCH A PRECISE MOTION OF PLANETS PREDICTABLE. DID BHRIGU KNEW LAWS OF PLANETARY MOTION AND RELATIVITY LONG BEFORE  KEPLER AND EINSTEIN .

NOTE GRAH IS MOST MISUSED SANSKRIT WORD USED TO ATTACK  ASTOLOGY . GRAH MEANS CAPACITY TO SIEGE(INFLUENCE). IT DOESN'T  MEAN PLANET .SO SUN ALONG WITH NODES (RAHU , KETU) AND SATURN , VENUS, ETC CAN BE CALLED THE NAVGRAH , NINE GRAH(THE NINE INFLUENCER) OF LIFE ON EARTH . SO THERE IS NO PROBLEM IN CALLING SUN A GRAH.

LASTLY IF EARTH BECOMES THE REFERENCE PLANE FOR STUDYING MOTION THERE IS NOT A PROBLEM IN ASSIGNING SUN A RELATIVE MOTION . SO STUDYING IT AS A GRAH  WITH MOTION (RELATIVE MOTION) AROUND EARTH SHOULD NOT BE A PROBLEM AND IS IN NO WAY DEBATABLE.

             

No comments:

Post a Comment